Fighter Pilot University
FU Store

Leadership

Posted by Jolly on May 13, 2015

Robin Olds: So Much More than a Consummate Warrior

John Q Public, By Tony Carr, 2 May 2015
 
olds6

Robin Olds is generally regarded as the definitive icon of the 20th century Air Force. But beyond etching his place into airpower history as an elite practitioner and institutional contrarian, Olds was a leader, intellectual, and mentor of the first order.

 

A good friend of mine was doing some research recently and found himself leafing through the papers of retired Brig. Gen. Terryl Schwalier. You might recall that Schwalier was the commander at the center of controversy surrounding the Khobar Towers bombing. His scapegoating by the Clinton Administration triggered the resignation of Gen. Ronald Fogleman, whose integrity prevented him from continuing as the Air Force’s Chief of Staff in the face of what he viewed as excessive headwinds made intolerable by the injustice of the Khobar fiasco. 

 

Turns out that as a Major in 1981, Schwalier had researched and written a paper for Air Command and Staff College. The report, titled “The Tactical Flight Commander — Developing Warriors,” was designed to give guidance to flight commanders, identifying personal qualities and leadership traits essential to success in the role. As part of his research, Schwalier reached out to several prominent leaders in the airpower community to ask their insights on the role of Flight Commander. 

 

Among the names on that roster was someone whose powerful blend of stalwart leadership and warrior acumen made him a favorite among squadron-level operators at the time. Someone with whom fighter pilots in particular heavily identified. That someone was none other than retired Brig. Gen. Robin Olds.

 

The late Olds responded in a way consistent with his reputation. He sent Schwalier a five-page handwritten letter absolutely dripping with leadership. Olds not only helped Schwalier with his original question, but gave him some incredible bonus material: singular insight into systemic problems with the institutional Air Force and the timeless struggle of airmen and leaders in finding fulfilling roles in a bureaucratic morass that seems to only grudgingly tolerate its dual status as a combat organization. Olds’ words, brilliantly luminous in 1981, ring just as true in 2015.

 

Here’s a transcription of his response (I’ve included captures of the actual pages at the end of this article):

 

30 Nov 1981

Dear Major Schwalier,

Your question, or better request, is provocative, to say the least.  I have thought much since receiving your Oct 21 letter, and the more I consider your topic, the more difficult it becomes to frame a reasonable or even useful response.  I’ll try to boil down my thoughts, hoping something useful may distill.

First, let me get some negatives in perspective.  In my view, current Air Force philosophy and practice have all but eliminated any meaningful role playable by an officer placed in a so-called position of command.  Authority has evaporated, sucked up to the rarified heights of “they,” who are somehow felt to exist in the echelons above.  For your information, “they” do not exist.  Neither is there any “he” fulfilling that role.  Authority is expressed through the medium of committee consensus, leadership has become a watered down adherence to the principles of camp counsellorship, with a 90% emphasis on avoiding any action that may in any way be questioned by any one of hundreds of piss ants on the administrative ladder above.  In fact, leadership (and I use that term with contempt) has become a process of looking busy as hell while doing nothing, avoiding personal commitment, and above all, making no decision without prior approval.

Historical example: as a 22 year old Major, commanding a squadron in 1945, I was responsible for and empowered to:  pay the troops; feed them; house them; train them; clothe them; promote; demote; reward; punish; maintain their personnel files, etc.  When I retired as a BG in 1973, I possessed not one of those authorities or responsibilities.  Get the drift?

And you ask the importance of a flight commander.  I am tempted to say NONE.  But that is not true, for in spite of the system, in spite of the executive and administrative castration, a man instinctively looks to a system of military authority in a military situation or system.  If that authority is waffled or watered, he still looks to those appointed to the military echelons to do their best under the circumstances.  A man (a nation for that matter) wants, demands, leadership.  So today’s flight leader/commander leads and commands by example, by appeal to basic instinct, and by light footed avoidance of error, like walking a tightrope.  He has responsibility, for sure.  But he does not have authority, or freedom of discretion/interpretation.  Unfortunately, in some units he really isn’t given much voice.  Yet he functions, and if he is successful (perhaps a better word is “effective”) it is greatly to his credit for having done so under the prevailing circumstances.

Another thought.  All else to the contrary, two basic demands are faced by the Flight Commander.  One is PEACE, the other is WAR.  It has been my experience, in the fighter business I hasten to add, that the man who may excel under the one is not necessarily worth a damn under the other.  Many examples come to mind.  I do not (and did not) condemn one man or the other, rather I accepted the challenge of recognizing the difference and choosing accordingly.

I hope some of this makes sense.

Sincerely,

Robin Olds

P.S. For your information, there is no such thing as HQ, USAF.  The highest echelon is a faceless entity, composed of thousands of diverse individuals loosely arranged by a system of interlocking committees and headed by an individual technically labeled the “Chief of Staff.”  Note he is not called the Commander.  By law, he cannot be.  By nature he is forced to be the consummate bureaucrat, fighting for the all mighty dollar, serving as a buffer between Sec Def / Congress and the people and mission of his service – a demanding, demeaning role playable by very few.  


An entire book-length analysis could easily be written about this letter. Seldom can any airman hope to encounter a more furiously burning, dense bundle of essential truths. But initially, two things jump out. (At the risk of doing violence to their public images by mentioning them here, I credit Jeff Donnithorne, Matt Brooks, and Aaron Sasson for including me in their conduct of an enlightening exchange about these initial reactions).

One immediate impression raised from this writing is the recognition of Olds’ considerable intellectual heft. The popular image of the lovable, devil-may-care, warrior firebrand is one Olds earned in spades. But it’s an incomplete portrait. He thought carefully and in great depth about his Air Force and its place in national affairs, and was extraordinarily literate in expressing himself about it. 

This is an important point. Olds stands as the definitive example many young airmen — particularly young officers — strive to embody. The notion of a binary division separating “intellectuals” from “true leaders” remains firmly entrenched in the culture of the institution, and it leads to a host of misguided and counterproductive policies, decisions, and characterizations. Olds proves to us that such a false dichotomy is baseless in the first place. It’s not only possible but absolutely essential that an air warrior also be a reflective and even contemplative leader. Olds lived up to that standard, and his words to Schwalier exhort others to do the same.

Another easily grasped takeaway is that the problems facing the Air Force today are not new. Olds lamented them as he retired in 1973, and they remained operative as he mentored Terry Schwalier in 1981. Top heaviness, micromanagement, loss of combat focus, misprioritization … all are directly addressed or implied in Olds’ letter. All are visiting upon the Air Force in 2015.

Lest we find this discouraging, it’s actually good news. It means we’ve been here before, and we found a way out of it. Much of what troubles Olds in his letter had been addressed, ameliorated, or even eradicated by the time the Air Force walloped Saddam Hussein a decade later in the First Gulf War. The institution got relatively healthy and remained that way for much of the 1990s, enjoying a Renaissance of sorts before the combined pressures of post-Cold War adaptation and response to the attacks of September 11, 2001 allowed many maladies to creep back in.

Whether these recurring institutional illnesses are tied to protracted wars, keyed to resources, or simply cyclical is a great discussion for another time. In the interim, we could do a lot worse than to consider the learned words of perhaps the ultimate airman.

If you haven’t yet digested “Fighter Pilot: The Memoirs of Legendary Ace Robin Olds,” do yourself a favor and give it a read. We have a lot to learn from Robin Olds. This letter demonstrates how so much of the wisdom he bequeathed to us remains undiscovered.

My thanks to Lt. Col. Jeff Donnithorne (an airpower wizard and strong leader in his own right) for sharing this amazing glimpse at Air Force history.

★   ★   ★   ★   ★

Olds_Letter1

 

Comments:

Posted by TigerLilly on
Very moving and to the point article on "Leadership" Jolly. I was fortunate to have had Robin as a wing commander back in Ubon. It was a brief experience as I was wrapping up my tour and Col Olds had just arrived. It became quickly apparent right out of the gate that this new wing winnie was no winnie. I now sit on a congressional military academy committee once a year and one of my first question to the cadet candidates is "do you know who BG Robin Olds is?" Rarely do any of them know anything about him. My next words to the many that don't is..."if you want to be a true leader you should study Robin Olds". Thank you for this post.
Posted by lazerlarry on
Great response to Terry Schwalier request in typical Robin Olds style,especially after reading his book. I had the privelige of serving with T. Schwalier in the 10th TFS at Hahn in the late 70's. I also was lucky enough to have been in the 421st TFS at Udorn with Maj Ron Fogleman and glean a lot of fighter/leadership that he passed on to the Lts and Capts in the squadron-it did not surprise me in the actions he took in behalf of BG Schwalier. Also have met Robin Olds several times and all things about him support the legends that surround him. Larry " Clit' Kavouras Retired L/C
Posted by Duke on
There's really nothing to add about the fighter pilots' fighter pilot. He's my hero.
Posted by ETHolm on
Flight Commander was my favorite job of all and, for all the excellent points Robin Olds makes in his letter to Terry Schwalier, I still believe it to be the mandatory level at which to instill the characteristics of a great leader, for war or peace: Set the mold before it gets infected with all the mealy-mouth CYA-by-committee crap and nourish it daily. The single major problem with this formula in today's Air Force is "WHO will do the nourishing?" Yes, who indeed!

I had young B/G Schwalier in a TX "re-bluing" course here at Luke Air Patch back in '96 just before he shipped out to Saudi: It was plain to me in retrospect he did what he needed to do to prevent the Khobar disaster but was ignored, rebuffed or stymied at myriad turns. Implying our hosts weren't providing the required level of security was a no-no.

Duke's right on target; Olds is my hero too, atop a list with Chuck Horner, Michael Ryan, and Ron Fogleman, all of whom shared an intense interest in developing me as a flight commander long ago. Anyone who shares this arcane interest in flight commandership, as did Schwalier, deserves a round of applause from the rest of us in the "Old Guard!"

I gotta re-read Old's book again; I need a morale boost!!

"E.T."
Posted by Jolly on
From John:

Olds was one of my fathers’ commanders at Landstuhl/Hahn back in 56.. and again at Misawa ...

Dad took his job as flight commander very seriously, his only problem was he was a reservist and never finished college.
He once told me he didn’t need a college degree - he had his doctorate in 'fighter pilot’. Perhaps why I and my brothers all had to get college done. He retired as a reserve major with over 5700 hours in sabres and super sabres and 3 tours as a fast FAC Misty FAC.

My mother once told the story that Olds advised her to carefully consider marrying my father - as he was a little crazy. Later? Dad’s wingmen have told me said he was the best teacher they ever had in F-100 - Cant think of a better way to honor Olds memory than that.

Jon S
Posted by covey42 on
Very accurate assessment.
I would add during my 40 plus years flying over 30,000+ hours, observing, one salient point stands out - courage.
Two statements I have seen too often and feel sadly run too common:
1) The pilots motto - I've got mine, fuck you!
2) The pilots' prayer - "Dear Lord, when I retire, may the Chief Pilot say, "Who was that man?"
What do both say - cowardice to an extreme. Oh, it is survival too.
Tiger Lilly, if you want an even more shocking question to ask a young person, ask them who won the Civil War and bet most don't know the NORTH. It is not a trick question. Just illustrates the lack of education in todays youth or worse our education system which is failing our children. Or ask them who was Joseph Stalin. These should not be hard questions to answer. Yet, our kids are not educated to know these people or events which they should know to make logic voting decisions in a nation such as ours. Or am I wrong?
Some say I am.
Covey42
Posted by StuM on
Got this note from Westy Westenhoff:
Baghwan

He was in the same company at West Point as my father. They got together in London in 1945 (nurses were involved and perhaps some beverages), and later Robin did an "impromptu aerial display" at my father's B-17 base, Snetterton heath, which he remembered to the day he died.

A fine man.

Westy

Stu the Baghwan
Posted by UlickMcEvaddy on
One cannot but agree with the sentiments expressed by BG Olds. Today it takes decades to field any new aircraft weapons system. In 1952 under the leadership of General Curtis Le May it took less than 18 months to field the B-52,the most iconic Bomber of the last 75 years. We have lost the art of fast procurement for two main reasons. Firstly the enemy of success is perfection and we keep redesigning rather than producing. Secondly,elapsed time kills all good ideas,today fielded systems take so long to produce they are almost obsolete on arrival. We often modernise systems because we can not because it is necessary,for example we could have just reproduced the KC-135 as designed with minor upgrades instead of converting a civil airliner into a tanker. The A-10 comes to mind. If I wanted a new CAS aircraft I would send the drawings for the A-10 to manufacturers and build the same iconic aircraft new again with minor system upgrades. After all the Chinese have not changed the design of chopsticks for the last 5,000 years because they are effective and cheap to produce in great numbers. By all means innovate,we need it but when an icon is created,keep it and it will be most cost effective. We need that type of leadership that knows when change is needed,like a new LRSB is vital for the future but should be fielded in less than a decade.
Ulick McEvaddy.
You must be logged in to leave a reply. Login »
 

Fighter Pilot University   |   1267 NW 355th, Holden, Missouri 64040   |   1-888-456-WTFO (9836)   |   info@fighterpilotuniversity.com
© 2020 Fighter Pilot University. Web development by Shout Marketing